ALFONZO EDWARDS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A prior conviction for possession of a controlled substance does not disqualify it as a predicate offense for habitual offender sentencing, even if the current offense is a violation related to controlled substances.
[1] A prior conviction for possession of a controlled substance may be used as a predicate offense for habitual offender sentencing, even if the current offense is not a viol…
[2] The habitual felony offender statute requires that the current felony offense be committed within five years of the defendant's last prior felony conviction or release fr…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDefendant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender based on prior convictions, including one for possession of a controlled substance. He argued th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Habitual Felony Offender Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
GRIFFIN, J.
Defendant, Alfonzo Edwards, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion. Defendant claims that he was improperly sentenced as an habitual felony offender because the trial court relied on a prior conviction for possession of a controlled substance which defendant contends cannot be used as a predicate offense for habitualization.
Section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes, requires that “[t]he felony for which the defendant is to be sentenced and one of the two prior felony convictions, is not a violation of section 893.13 relating to the purchase or the possession of a controlled substance.” Section 775.084(l)(a)2 provides that the felony for which the defendant is being sentenced must be committed within five years of defendant’s last prior felony or defendant’s release from a prison sentence for a felony. Defendant received an habitual offender sentence for sale of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school. Although one of his prior convictions was a violation of section 893.13, the sentencing transcript attached to the trial court’s order confirms that defendant’s other prior convictions were for aggravated assault, attempted kidnapping, false imprisonment, battery, resisting arrest without violence and accessory to armed robbery.
Defendant complains that his new offense was not committed within five years of release from prison for a qualified predicate offense, arguing that the possession offense does not qualify for use as a predicate. Nothing in the statute, however, prohibits sentencing a defendant as a habitual felony offender when the current offense was committed within five years of, release from prison for a conviction for purchase or possession of a controlled substance in violation of 893.13. As we pointed out in Clark v. State, 681 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), the habitual felony offender statute only requires that defendant’s last prior felony conviction, or release from prison, be within five years of the date of the current offense.
AFFIRMED.
HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Ulysses Lynch v. State, 881 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…nd (l)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (2002), when read in pari mate-ria. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that this “is not provided in the statute and should not be read into the statute as a matter of statutory construction.” See Edwards v. State, 743 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (“Nothing in the statute ... prohibits sentencing a defendant as a habitual felony offender when the current offense was committed within five years of release from prison for a conviction for [*94] purchase or possession of a co…
-
Rubin Jones v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)…. 2005); Jones v. State, 61 So. 3d 1124 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); McCall v. State, 862 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Lynch v. State, 881 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Woods v. State, 807 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Edwards v. State, 743 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). MORRIS, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.…
-
Walton v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)…M. Affirmed. See Ishmael v. State, 735 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Lynch v. State, 881 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Gutierrez v. State, 854 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Woods v. State, 807 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Edwards v. State, 743 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Middleton v. State, 721 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). KELLY, ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Tavano v. Suely Meire Abbate Tavano, 681 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)