ADOLPHUS S. ASHLEY, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL W. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. 1st DCA | 1999-10-20
No. 98-3009
ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.
742 So. 2d 533 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Adolphus Ashley challenged the trial court's denial of his habeas corpus petition by appealing to the appellate court, which converted the appeal to a certiorari petition. The court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction because Ashley failed to timely serve his motion for rehearing within the required timeframe, and his arguments for equitable tolling lacked merit.


Holding

The court lacked jurisdiction because the motion for rehearing was not timely served and therefore did not postpone rendition of the order. The five-day extension Ashley sought does not apply in this context, and claims of interference by prison officials must be raised by motion to the trial court for relief from judgment, not by appellate proceeding.


Headnotes

[1] A motion for rehearing must be timely served to postpone rendition of an order.

[2] Jurisdiction to review an order by certiorari must be invoked within 30 days of the order's rendition.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“This court's certiorari jurisdiction, like appellate jurisdiction, must be invoked within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.”

Establishes the jurisdictional deadline for both certiorari and appellate review

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Ashley filed a habeas corpus petition in circuit court, which was denied. He attempted to appeal the denial but failed to timely serve a motion for re…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Adolphus S. Ashley appealed an order of the -circuit court which denied a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Subsequently, this court converted the appeal to a petition for writ of certiorari. Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c); Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla.1998).

On this court’s own motion, Ashley was directed to show cause why this proceeding should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A review of the file showed that a motion for rehearing was not timely served and it therefore did not postpone rendition of the order. Luttrell v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 578 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). This court’s certiorari jurisdiction, like appellate jurisdiction, must be invoked within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h); 9.100(e)(1); 9.110(b). In response, petitioner argues that he should be entitled to an additional five days in computing the time for service of his motion for rehearing in accordance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.090(e). This argument is without merit. Grabarnick v. Florida Homeowners Association, 419 So. 2d 1065 (Fla.1982). He also contends that prison officials frustrated his ability to timely prepare and serve his motion for rehearing. We find that the proper avenue to present such a claim is by motion to the trial court for relief from judgment. Cf. Snelson v. Snelson, 440 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (1.540(b) motion is remedy where party claims order was not received in time to appeal). Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to petitioner’s right to move the trial court for relief from judgment.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw