SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
PINECREST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; D/B/A PINECREST CONVALESCENT HOME AND BARTON D. WEISMAN, A GENERAL PARTNER, APPELLEES
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
PINECREST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; D/B/A PINECREST CONVALESCENT HOME AND BARTON D. WEISMAN, A GENERAL PARTNER, APPELLEES
739 So. 2d 733
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney’s fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So. 2d 339 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So. 2d 52 (Fla.1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Lamm, 218 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 225 So. 2d 529 (Fla.1969).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Haynes, 793 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…olicy only if attorney’s fees are deemed to be damages under its insurance policy issued to Home Away. While the summary judgment below was pending, the third district issued its opinion in Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Pinecrest Limited Partnership, 739 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court felt it was bound by that opinion.2 Scottsdale conceded below that the issue was identical to the issue in this case, but it argued the case should not be precedent because of the brevity of the opinion. The Pinec…
-
Francois Richardson v. State, 46 So. 3d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Davis v. State, 661 So. 2d 1193 (Fla.1995), receded, from, in part on other grounds, Carter v. State, 786 So. 2d 1173 (Fla.2001); Lewis v. State, 911 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Francois v. State, 739 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).…
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1987)
- Edmor Props., Inc. v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 225 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1969)
- Vanzant v. Davies, 225 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1969)
- The Prudential Ins. Co. OF Am. v. Lamm, 218 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Max W. Wilson, M.D. v. Wasser, 562 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1990)