PLEDGER BROTHERS, A FIRM COMPOSED OF W. D. PLEDGER AND P. M. PLEDGER, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
THE WESTERN RAILWAY OF ALABAMA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1925-10-31
West, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.
90 Fla. 419 Florida Supreme Court (1925) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 106 So. 406
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

West, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mardorff v. State, 143 Fla. 64 (Fla. 1940)
    …v. State, 28 Fla. 511, 10 South. Rep. 106.” It will be observed that the rule in Adams v. State, supra, is cited as to photography which may be used to assist or help a witness to explain his evidence. In the case of Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406, this Court said: “There was no error in admitting in evidence a picture, identified as a true representation of the premises where the homicide occurred.” There is cited: Adams v. State, 28 Fla. 511, 10 South. Rep. 106; Young v. State, 85 Fla. 348,…
  • Acree v. State, 153 Fla. 561 (Fla. 1943)
    …ladden v. State, 12 Fla. 562; Ballard v. State, 31 Fla. 266, 12 So. 865; Pittman v. State, 51 Fla. 94, 41 So. 385, 8 L.R.A. (N.S.) 509; Moore v. State, 59 Fla. 23, 52 So. 971; Landrum v. State, 79 Fla. 189, 84 So. 535; Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 So. 406, and many other cases. Section 199 of the Criminal Code— Section 916.05, Fla. Stats. 1941 — enumerates the several formal requirements of an application for a continuance of a criminal case on the ground of an absent and necessary witness. [*566] In…
  • Tige Scholl v. State, 94 Fla. 1138 (Fla. 1927)
    …9 Fla. 189, 84 South. Rep. 535; Danford v. State, 53 Fla. 4, 43 South. Rep. 593; Owens [*1140] v. State, 64 Fla. 383, 60 South. Rep. 340; Doke v. State, 71 Fla. 633, 71 South. Rep. 917.” And the opinion in the case of Sanford v. State, 90 Fla. 337, 106 Sou. 406, in which the Court say: “The question of self-defense is one of fact, and where the evidence, though conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the finding of the jury against a claim of self-defense, a verdict of conviction, based upon such finding, w…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw