ED WANG, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
R. S. LARKIN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
ED WANG, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
R. S. LARKIN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
90 Fla. 419
Florida Supreme Court (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.-
No assignments of errors having been filed in this court, as required by the statute, and Special Supreme Court Rules 1 and 2, this Writ of error will have to be dismissed.
Writ of Error dismissed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harper v. Bronson, 98 Fla. 941 (Fla. 1929)…h the clerk “as a guide for making up the transcript” as required by Special Rule 2 of the Circuit Court Rules, requires the dismissal of the writ of error, either on motion made, or sua sponte when discovered by the Court. See also, Wang v. Larkin, 90 Fla. 419, 106 So. R. 406. The amendment sought by plaintiff in error would not in any way, when granted, cause a change in the record used “as a guide for making up the transcript.’’ The second assignment of error attacks one ruling of the trial court, whi…
-
Quality Furniture House, Inc. v. Gen. Bond & Disc. Co., 97 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1957)…Failure of an appellant to file assignments of error within the time specified by court rule long has been recognized as a basis for dismissal of an appeal. Florida Cent. & P. R. Co. v. Peacock, 1902, 44 Fla. 176, 33 So. 247; Wang v. Larkin, 1925, 90 Fla. 419, 106 So. 406; Farmer Concrete Works v. Gillooley, 1926, 91 Fla. 316, 107 So. 404; In re Lofton’s Estate, 1943, 152 Fla. 626, 12 So. 2d 587; Goldtrap v. Mancini, Fla.1956, 86 So. 2d 141. Cf. Williams v. La Penotiere, 1889, 25 Fla. 473, 6 So. 167 (for…