JOHN BELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN BELL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
737 So. 2d 615
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order finding that appellant violated his probation. Because appellant received a split sentence totaling the maximum time available for the underlying second degree felony, the sentence must be corrected to show that appellant is entitled to credit for time spent on probation, as well as credit for time spent in jail awaiting sentencing for the violation of probation.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
BARFIELD, C.J. and KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nippon Carbide Indus. (USA), Inc. v. State, 755 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…I did not meet its burden of “demonstrating that the proposed agency action is ‘clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.’ ” See § 120.57(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998); see also GTECH Corp. v. State, Dep’t of the Lottery, 737 So. 2d 615, 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Because competent substantial evidence supports the administrative law judge’s findings, we affirm. See State Contracting and Eng’g Corp. v. Department of Transp., 709 So. 2d 607, 609 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Hubbard Constr. Co…
-
State v. Gtech Corp., 816 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…MINER, J. Albeit involving different issues, this ongoing dispute makes its second appearance before this court. In GTECH v. State, Department of Lottery, 737 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (Gtech I) a divided court held that the Department of Lottery did not violate applicable procurement procedures or due process by referring contending proposals back to an evaluation committee for correction of errors. All the ev…
-
Hadi v. Liberty Behavioral Health Corp., 927 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…y conducting either a formal or an informal hearing. See § 120.57(1) — (2), Fla. Stat. (2005) If disputed issues of material fact exist, a formal hearing must be held. See § 120.57(3)(d)3, Fla. Stat. (2005); see also GTECH Corp. v. Dep’t of Lottery, 737 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). No Disputed Issues of Material Fact Liberty’s assertions that disputed issues of material fact exist, do not create disputed issues of material fact. See generally, e.g., Geer v. Jacobsen, 880 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). If…