SANDRA L. SOTO, APPELLANT,
v.
NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION AND ESSERMAN NISSAN, LTD., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1999-06-02
No. 98-3084
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON, and LEVY, JJ.
734 So. 2d 1154 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1999) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1155] PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 501.204(2), Fla. Stat. (1997); Ex Parte Ford Motor Credit Co., 717 So. 2d 781 (Ala.1997); Blon v. Bank One, Akron, N.A., 35 Ohio St.3d 98, 519 N.E. 2d 363 (1988).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Knapp v. State, 741 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
    …ginal sentence imposed was not illegal. Cf Sims. Once a defendant begins serving a legal sentence, a court may not increase his sentence because to do so would violate double jeopardy. See Troupe v. Rowe, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Harris v. State, 734 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Therefore, we vacate Knapp’s amended sentence because the court lacked jurisdiction to impose it, and we remand with directions to reimpose the original sentence without the minimum mandatory terms. The Department of Corrections…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw