JEANNETTE NAZARIO, APPELLANT,

v.

WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• B.M. v. State, 744 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …below was that the victim did not establish the fair market value of his loss. This court has recently held that B.M.’s co-defendant, T.F., cannot complain of the identical issue on appeal for lack of preservation in the trial court. T.F. v. State, 734 So. 2d 601, 1999 WL 445717 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). See also Tillman v. State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985); J.C. v. State, 722 So. 2d 982, 983 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). If the loss proposal were objectionable on hearsay grounds, equivalent competent evidence was likel…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• T.K. v. State, 743 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …and part of the house. The criminal process culminated in a single restitution hearing for all five children. This court has already addressed separate appeals by B.M., T.F., and M.K. B.M. v. State, 744 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); T.F. v. State, 734 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), and M.K. v. State, 732 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Even if the error had been preserved> we agree with inference in M K¡ which infer. ence is based upon that opinion’s reference to Dickens v. State, 350 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1s…

Authorities Cited

• Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Phoebe C. Trusell et vir, 131 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1961)