BRYAN C. GOODE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1999-05-07
No. 97-2598
DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
733 So. 2d 1082 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1999)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Goode appeals from the judgments and sentences entered in four separate cases. We affirm his convictions but reverse and remand for resentencing because of various guideline scoresheet errors.

At sentencing, the trial court did not have the benefit of Dillard v. State, 728 So. 2d 725 (Fla.1999), wherein the supreme court explained the procedures to be followed where, as here, two versions of the guidelines are involved. See also Quinn v. State, 692 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (“[T]he trial court was required to receive two scoresheets and impose a guidelines sentence pursuant to each scoresheet.”).

Goode’s remaining points on appeal are either without merit or have not been preserved for review.

REVERSED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw