LAURIE JUSTICE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial counsel's performance was not substandard, and thus the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was without merit.
Laurie Justice sought post-conviction relief, primarily alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The appellate court reviewed the trial proce…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Recusal Of Judge cases and more on FLexlaw
GRIFFIN, C.J.
We have for review the order denying Laurie Justice’s motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Principally, Mrs. Justice claims her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance.1
Appellant’s multi-faceted motion for post-conviction relief on the ground of ineffective assistance of trial counsel has caused us once again to examine Mrs. Justice’s trial in detail. As we found no trial court error contributing to her conviction, we now find no merit to the claim that her lawyer’s performance was substandard.
AFFIRMED.
COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur. . Mrs. Justice also appeals the lower court's refusal to consider other 3.850 claims because of her administrative probationary status and the trial judge's refusal to recuse himself. As to the former, while the decision of the lower court appears to have been erroneous, it does not matter because the claims in question are not legally sufficient. As to the multiple claimed grounds for recusal, only two are not frivolous and they are not substantial. We find no reversible error in the denial of the recusal motion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wallace v. Dep't OF Revenue, 774 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…were made to his children on his behalf, we hold that they should have been applied to meet the obligation incurred simultaneously with their receipt, notwithstanding the lack of a petition for modification.3 See State, Dep’t of Revenue v. Sprague, 733 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Kirwan v. Kirwan, 606 So. 2d 771, 772 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Francisco v. Francisco, 505 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Mr. Wallace asserts that he should receive credit for the full amount of all benefits paid to the children. T…