THOMAS E. ROSE, M.D., APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,

v.

HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

Citator

Cited By

• E.B. v. State, 866 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …wn were consensual. However, consent in a police-citizen encounter may be revoked by the citizen. Phillips v. State, 707 So. 2d 774 (Fla. [*203] 2d DCA 1998). The limits of the search are defined by the extent of the consent given. Jacobs v. State, 733 So. 2d 552, 554 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (“The scope of consent to search is generally limited to what a reasonable person would have understood to be the object of the search during the exchange between that person and the police.”); State v. Wells, 539 So. 2d 464,…
• Smith v. State, 753 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
  …la. 1st DCA 1999). Consent, once given in a consensual encounter, may be revoked by the citizen, see Phillips v. State, 707 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); and the limits of consent are defined by the extent of the consent given, see Jacobs v. State, 733 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). When Mr. Smith failed to comply with the officer’s command to lift his tongue, a command with which he had no legal duty to comply and which the officer had no legal authority to compel, Officer Tull attempted to procure complia…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Alamo v. State, 891 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …State, 866 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). “The scope of consent to search is generally limited to what a reasonable person would have understood to be the object of the search during the exchange between that person and the police.” Jacobs v. State, 733 So. 2d 552, 554 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Thus, when relying upon consent to justify a search, law enforcement has “no more authority than that reasonably conferred by the terms of the consent.” State v. Wells, 539 So. 2d 464, 467 (Fla.1989). ■Here, the legal autho…

Authorities Cited

• Eugene Holly, M.D. v. Albert W. Auld, M.D., 450 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1984)
• Parrado v. State, 599 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 1992)
• Elois Posey Cruger v. Douglas J. Love, M.D., 599 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 1992)