JEREME T. BROWN, PETITIONER,

v.

HARRY K. SINGLETARY, JR., SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2006)
  …‘conditions’ of the settlement, but rather mechanical and legally inconsequential means of effecting it. They thus should be regarded as mere surplusage, the existence of which should not affect substantial rights.” Earnest & Stewart, Inc. v. Codina 732 So. 2d 364, 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). A few decisions, mostly from the Third District, have expressed this view. See Delpa, Inc. v. Martinez, 878 So. 2d 455, 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Gulf Coast Transp., Inc. v. Padron, 782 So. 2d 464, 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Kapl…
• Flight Express, Inc. v. Robinson, 736 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  …a Statutes (1995).1 See generally, Cooper v. Brickell Bayview Real Estate, Inc., 711 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). On this basis, the order denying the application for fees under § 768.79 is vacated. Since, as in Earnest & Stewart, Inc. v. Codina, 732 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)[24 FLW D388], the trial court did not rule on the validity of the offer in any other respect, including the threshold issue of whether it was made in good faith, see Fox v. McCaw Cellular Comm., — So. 2d -, 1998 WL 870859 (Fla. 4t…
• Kaplan v. Goldfarb, 777 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
  …osts. The motion was brought pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1990). We reverse because the release and dismissal provisions requested in Kaplan’s Offer of Judgment are not invalidating conditions. See Earnest & Stewart, Inc. v. Codina, 732 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.…

Authorities Cited

• Ervin McCRAY v. State, 699 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 1997)