MAURICE BELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MAURICE BELL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
731 So. 2d 85
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
On the merits we affirm Maurice Bell’s conviction and sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written judgment and sentence. See Fenn v. State, 702 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Notwithstanding the trial court’s dismissal of two counts of attempted murder and one count of shooting into a vehicle, the judgment and sentence reflect convictions on these counts as well as on the single count of attempted first degree murder for which the jury found Bell guilty. On remand the trial court shall delete from the judgment and sentence any reference to counts 2, 3, and 4.
Remanded with directions.
FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J„ Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lovell Williams, Jr. v. State, 821 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…of at the sentencing hearing showing that his plea was involuntary. Because Williams failed to demonstrate good cause for the withdrawal of his plea, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Williams’s motion. See Washington v. State, 731 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Williams next asserts that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence which exceeded the sentence specified in the plea agreement. We do not address the merits of Williams’s claim because he failed to raise this specific issue…
Authorities Cited
- Fenn v. State, 702 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)