W. J. RICE AND CARY L. RICE, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE BANK OF MILTON, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE
W. J. RICE AND CARY L. RICE, APPELLANTS,
STATE BANK OF MILTON, A CORPORATION, APPELLEE
89 Fla. 490
Florida Supreme Court (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the samé are hereby, affirmed.
West, C. J., and Wi-iitpield, Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Troop v. State, 98 Fla. 385 (Fla. 1929)…State, 110 So. R. 528; Ming v. State, 89 Fla. 280, 103 So. R. 618; Platt v. State, 65 Fla. 253, 61 So. R. 502; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179, 79 So. R. 450; Towsend v. State, 116 So. R. 7; Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 So. R. 176; Knowles v. State, 89 Fla. 490, 97 So. R. 716; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179, 79 So. R. 450. By what is said herein we neither hold nor infer that McMillan ’s testimony as to the identity of these defendants must finally and conclusively yield to the contradictory testimony interp…
-
Lyll McLeod v. State, 128 Fla. 35 (Fla. 1937)…loses, by any adjudication. As long as the record affirmatively showed that the defendant had not been arraigned on the information, there was no issue joined for the jury to try and, therefore, no issue for the jury to determine. In Sears v. State, 89 Fla. 490, 104 Sou. 857, we held: “When the court’s attention was called, as appears from the record, to the omission, due to oversight, to arraign the defendant, it was proper to then arraign him and proceed with the trial. Prior to arraignment there was no…
-
State ex rel. Frank J. Ryan v. Hon. A. D. McNeill, 141 Fla. 304 (Fla. 1940)…n no arraignment of the defendant on the information and no plea to the indictment, so there was no issue to be tried by the jury and consequently the defendant was not put in jeopardy before the jury was discharged in this case. See Sears v. State, 89 Fla. 490, 104 So. 857; McLeod v. State, 128 Fla. 35, 40, 174 So. 466; U. S. v. Riley, 5 Blatchf. 204; Green v. State, 28 A. L. R. 842, headnote 5; 16 C. J. 236-243-4; Colleys Const. Lim. (8th Ed.), p. 687, col. 2. Where the defendant merely announces by cou…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence