TINA M. O'CONNOR, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA BLOOD SERVICES, INC. AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Competent Substantial Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Tina M. O’Connor appeals the denial of her claim for unemployment benefits. The appeals referee found that Ms. O’Connor is not entitled to benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause attributable to her employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). The Unemployment Appeals Commission affirmed the appeals referee’s decision. On appeal to this court, the commission’s order is entitled to a presumption of correctness. See Kelle v. D.H. Holmes Co., Ltd., 658 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We find no legal error. Ms. O’Connor failed to provide a transcript of the hearing; and competent, substantial evidence in the record supports the finding of disqualification for unemployment compensation benefits. Therefore, we affirm the determination that Ms. O’Connor is not eligible for unemployment benefits. See Smalls v. State, Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 485 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ruiz v. DE Varona, 785 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…r sister courts have ruled that summary judgment may be appropriate. See Morgan v. Thomson, 427 So. 2d 1134, 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)(“No motion, no relief, no error.”); see also In re Forfeiture of 1982 Ford Mustang, Vehicle ID No. ABP16F6CF190433, 725 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1998)(concluding that in compliance with Rule 1.370 a motion must be made before an admission may be withdrawn, but motion could be made ore ten-us). In Sher v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 557 So. 2d 638, 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), however, th…
-
In re Forfeiture OF $2470.00 IN U.S. Currency. Ira Bull Moreland v. The City of Fort Myers, 164 So. 3d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…has discretion to rely on a technically deemed admission to support a summary judgment, it is error to do so if the record contains evidence contradicting the admission. Walker v. City of Bartow Police Dep’t (In re Forfeiture of 1982 Ford Mustang), 725 So. 2d 382, 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); see also Mahmoud v. King, 824 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (holding, and citing like cases that hold, summary judgment is not proper based on a failure to respond to requests for admissions when the record otherwise reveal…
-
Sudman v. O'Brien, 218 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…tically resulting from a failure to timely answer a request for admissions” even where the party later files a pleading or affidavit conflicting with the admissions); cf. Walker v. City of Bartow Police Dep’t (In re Forfeiture of 1982 Ford Mustang), 725 So. 2d 382, 384 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (reversing and remanding for trial court to consider defendant’s request to be relieved from his admissions, which request was made orally at a hearing on the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, because [*988] “an ore ten…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- T.H. v. State, 658 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- Smalls v. State, 485 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)