VERONICA HIGGS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE/ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHIQUETA NICOLE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
DON BAILEY CARPETS, INC. AND WILLIAM D. BAILEY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A mother, as personal representative of her deceased child's estate, appealed summary judgments dismissing her negligence claims against a carpet company and building owner for an accident in their alleyway. The court affirmed, holding that the defendants had no duty to maintain the alleyway (which was publicly owned) and that the carpet company could not be held vicariously liable for the driver's negligence because the driver was an independent contractor.
The defendants were entitled to summary judgment on both counts. First, because Metropolitan Dade County was the record titleholder of the alleyway with no evidence of transferred duty, the defendants had no duty to maintain it. Second, because the driver was an independent contractor rather than an employee, Don Bailey Carpets could not be held vicariously liable for the driver's negligence.
[1] A property owner or tenant is not liable for negligent maintenance of a public alleyway absent evidence that the duty to maintain was transferred from the governmental en…
[2] A party is not vicariously liable for the negligence of an independent contractor unless the party exercises the degree of control over the contractor's work necessary to…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The record clearly shows that Metropolitan Dade County is the record titleholder of the alleyway, and the record is devoid of any evidence tending to show that Metropolitan Dade County transferred its duty to maintain the alleyway to either DBC or to Bailey.”
Establishes that defendants had no duty to maintain the alleyway as a matter of law.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA minor was struck and killed by a delivery van in an alleyway behind a strip mall housing Don Bailey Carpets, Inc. The van swerved to avoid a pothole…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Duty To Maintain cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff, Veronica Higgs, appeals from adverse final summary judgments in favor of Don Bailey Carpets, Inc. [DBC] and William D. Bailey [Bailey]. We affirm.
The underlying action stems from an accident that occurred in the alleyway behind the strip mall where DBC is located. In the early morning hours, a minor who was walking in the alleyway was struck and killed by the driver of a delivery van who had swerved to avoid a pothole and was unable to slow due to brake failure. As a result, Veronica Higgs, the decedent’s mother, brought suit, as personal representative/administrator of the estate, against several defendants, including DBC and Bailey. Higgs alleged that DBC, as tenant, and William D. Bailey, as owner of the building where DBC is housed, had negligently failed to maintain the alleyway. Further, Higgs also alleged that DBC was vicariously liable for the negligence of the driver who was employed by DBC as a carpet installer. Thereafter, the trial court granted final summary judgments in favor of DBC and Bailey on these counts.
First, a review of the record shows that DBC and Bailey were entitled to summary judgments, as a matter of law, on the counts for negligent maintenance of the alleyway. The record clearly shows that Metropolitan Dade County is the record titleholder of the alleyway, and the record is devoid of any evidence tending to show that Metropolitan Dade County transferred its duty to maintain the alleyway to either DBC or to Bailey. Therefore, we affirm the entry of final summary judgments in favor of DBC and Bailey on the counts for negligent maintenance of the alleyway.
Next, a further review of the record shows that DBC was entitled to summary judgment, as a matter of law, on the count for vicarious liability for the negligence of the driver. The record clearly establishes that the driver in question, a carpet installer, was an independent contractor, not an employee of DBC. Cantor v. Cochran, 184 So. 2d 173 (Fla.1966); Wiseman v. Miami Rug Co., 524 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Kane Furniture Corp. v. Miranda, 506 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 515 So. 2d 230 (Fla.1987). The evidence in the record shows that DBC did not exercise the degree of control necessary over the manner, method, and details of the carpet installer’s work to indicate an employer/employee relationship. Eighty Four Lumber v. Bethel, 544 So. 2d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Kane Furniture, 506 So. 2d at 1064. Therefore, we affirm the entry of final summary judgment in favor of DBC on the count for vicarious liability for the negligence of the driver. Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cantor v. Robert Cochran & the Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 184 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 1966)
- Kane Furniture Corp. v. Romulo Miranda, 506 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
- Stratton OF Fla., Inc. v. Rodel Fire Prot., Inc., 524 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- Wiseman v. Miami RUG Co., 524 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
- Eighty Four Lumber v. Bethel, 544 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)