R. P. REESE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
COUNTY OF ESCAMBIA, IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1925-02-14
Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
89 Fla. 99 Florida Supreme Court (1925) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court' being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Stringfellow v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co., 64 F.2d 173 (5th Cir. 1933)
    …gley v. S. A. L. R. Co., 84 Fla. 147, 93 So. 170, 171, the judgment of the court was “affirmed, on the authority of the S. A. L. v. Tomberlin, 70 Fla. 435, 70 So. 437; L. & N. v. Padgett, 71 Fla. 90, 70 So. 998.” In Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Gornto, 89 Fla. 99, 103 So. 117, the judgment was “reversed upon authority of” the Egley, Padgett, and Tomberlin Cases. “It seems clear that the injury was caused by the plaintiffs’ own negligence, since, if they had in fact looked down the track, they would have see…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw