ELWOOD J. HUNNEWELL, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
PALM BEACH COUNTY, AND PALM BEACH COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND TERRY VERNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A EMPLOYEE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
We affirm an order denying appellant’s petition for temporary injunction against the county enforcing Chapter 791, Florida Statutes (1997), which regulates the sale of fireworks. We reject appellant’s argument that either the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2051 et seq. or the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1261 et seq. preempts states from regulating or prohibiting the sale of fireworks. See United States v. Marcyes, 557 F. 2d 1361 (9th Cir.1977). Because appellant failed to demonstrate that the items he was selling were not fireworks within the definition contained in section 791.01(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997) the trial court properly denied the injunction.
KLEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Zackery Holiday v. State, 753 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 2000)…LEWIS, J. We have for review Holiday v. State, 730 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), which certified conflict with Miller v. State, 723 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), as to whether the trial court committed fundamental error by instructing the jury with the then-current standard instruction on entrapment when such instruction had not yet been modified — as it was later in Standard Jury Instru…
-
Zackery Holiday v. State, 730 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…damental error.” Since the entrapment instruction pertains to a defense rather than to an essential element of the crime charged, no fundamental error occurred. We recognize that the Fourth District recently ruled to the contrary in Miller v. State, 723 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), and accordingly certify conflict with that decision. AFFIRMED. BOOTH, JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.…
-
Crutchfield v. State, 739 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…laim was not properly preserved because he did not object at trial and that any error was invited. The cases cited by the state for this proposition are persuasive; however, the state fails to consider this court’s recent opinion in Miller v. State, 723 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. granted, State v. Miller, 732 So. 2d 328 (Fla.1999). In Miller, the trial court utilized the same jury instruction on entrapment as the trial court used in the case before us. See id. at 354. Even though the defendant in Mi…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Marcyes, 557 F.2d 1361 (9th Cir. 1977)