JOHNEY DUREN, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY E. SIMONS, APPELLEE
JOHNEY DUREN, APPELLANT,
MARY E. SIMONS, APPELLEE
88 Fla. 524
Florida Supreme Court (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considerd, ordered and adjudged by tbe Court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Corp. v. Robinson, 263 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)…s of damages not appropriate here. . Hardison v. Threets (Fla.App.1970), 241 So. 2d 694, 695, reversed on other grounds (Fla.1971), 255 So. 2d 267. . See, Burch v. Gilbert (Fla.App.1963), 148 So. 2d 289; and Marianna & B. R. Co. v. May (Fla.1922), 88 Fla. 524, 91 So. 553. We recognize that when the estate of a minor is involved damages are of necessity more speculative. Not so with elderly persons as here. Cf. Threets v. Hardison (Fla.1971), 255 So. 2d 267. . See, Hardison v. Threets, id., and Burch v.…