LEMUEL ISAAC, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LEMUEL ISAAC, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
720 So. 2d 306
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Lemuel Isaac, was convicted by a jury of two counts of armed robbery, one count of kidnapping, one count of grand theft and one count of burglary while armed. In this appeal he raises several issues, only one of which we find to be meritorious. Convictions for armed robbery and grand theft cannot coexist when, as here, stolen property is the same for both crimes. Crittenden v. State, 684 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Therefore, we reverse Isaac’s conviction for grand theft and remand to the trial court with instructions to enter a judgment dis charging appellant from that offense. We affirm as to all other points raised.
ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lemuel E. Isaac v. State, 911 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…wledges the complex nature of this case’s procedural history. No dispute exists, however, that the convictions for which Isaac has ultimately been sentenced became final as of this court’s appellate decision after the plenary appeal. Isaac v. State, 720 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). In that appeal, we left intact the four counts for which Isaac has been repeatedly sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years. See id. at 306-07. Accordingly, the convictions were final no later than November 10, 1998, the da…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Crittenden v. State, 684 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)