K.R., MOTHER OF A.O. AND J.R., MINOR CHILDREN, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1998-10-29
No. 97-1639
JOANOS, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
719 So. 2d 993 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

K.R., the natural mother of the minor children A.O. and J.R., challenges the termination of her parental rights over these children arguing that the termination is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. Having carefully and thoroughly reviewed the record, we cannot say as a matter of law that the evidence before the lower court was not clear and convincing. See In the Interest of D.J.S. and J.S.G., 563 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, the adjudicatory order and the final judgment of termination of parental rights is AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Arsene Frederic v. State, 770 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
    …at due to the victim’s age or mental capacity, the jury might perceive the victim as naive and thus should have been allowed to consider evidence that might help them evaluate the victim’s testimony of sexually explicit matters. See Bisbee v. State, 719 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Hammond v. State, 660 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). To contrast, here, the trial evidence showed the victim was thirteen at the time of the abuse. She became pregnant as a result of the abuse, so she had already reached pubert…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw