POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND RISCORP, APPELLANT,
v.
JESUS SANTANA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1998-10-05
No. 98-535
BOOTH, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
718 So. 2d 932 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed a workers' compensation award of permanent and total disability benefits to an employee with carpal tunnel syndrome, holding that evidence of the claimant's substantial earning capacity as a security guard precluded such an award under Florida law.


Holding

Permanent and total disability benefits are not available when there is proof of a substantial earning capacity, even absent a finding that the injury is catastrophic. The claimant's successful performance as a security guard until quitting for unrelated health reasons constitutes sufficient evidence of substantial earning capacity to preclude the award.


Headnotes

[1] Permanent total disability benefits are only available in the absence of conclusive proof of a substantial earning capacity, unless the injury is catastrophic.

[2] A claimant's ability to perform a job successfully, even if later quit due to unrelated health issues, can constitute proof of substantial earning capacity.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Only a catastrophic injury as defined in s. 440.02 shall, in the absence of conclusive proof of a substantial earning capacity, constitute permanent total disability.”

Establishes that substantial earning capacity is a bar to permanent total disability benefits absent a catastrophic injury classification

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

In early 1994, the claimant was injured at work and diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, undergoing two surgical releases. After returning to his em…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier appeal a workers’ compensation order awarding permanent and total disability benefits to the claimant. Because there is evidence that the claimant has a substantial earning capacity, we reverse.

In early 1994, the claimant was injured in the course and scope of his employment. Diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, the claimant underwent two carpal tunnel releases. After these surgeries, the claimant returned to the employer but was informed he no longer had a job.

Eventually, the claimant took a security guard course and obtained employment as a security guard. He successfully performed this job until his schedule was switched to days. Because health problems unrelated to his industrial injury prevented him from working days, the claimant quit the security guard position.

Section 440.15(l)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994) states:

Only a catastrophic injury as defined in s. 440.02 shall, in the absence of conclusive proof of a substantial earning capacity, constitute permanent total disability. Only claimants with catastrophic injuries are eligible for permanent total benefits. In no other case may permanent total disability be awarded.

(Emphasis added). Under this section, the judge has no need to determine whether a claimant’s injury is catastrophic as defined in section 440.02(34), Florida Statutes if there is proof of a substantial earning capacity. In this case, the judge erroneously applied section 440.02 even though there was proof that the claimant had such an earning capacity.

The claimant’s industrial injury did not prevent him from performing the security guard position. In fact, he was successfully performing this job until his schedule was changed and he decided to quit because of health problems which were unrelated to the industrial injury. This evidence is sufficient to prove a substantial earning capacity. Thus, the judge erred in awarding the claimant permanent and total disability benefits. See e.g. Brannon v. Tampa Tribune, 711 So. 2d 97, 98 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(stating that “the classification of permanent total disability in section 440.15(1) assumes the injury has caused a total loss of the employee’s earning capacity”); United States Fidelity and Guaranty Ass’n v. Kemp, 658 So. 2d 1212, 1213 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(stating the general proposition that “[a]n inability to engage in any meaningful employment would support the conclusion that one is permanently totally disabled”). Accordingly, we reverse the award of permanent and total disability benefits.

BOOTH, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Myhand v. Canteen Food Serv. & Gab Robins, 790 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Polk County School Board v. Santana, 718 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), review denied, 727 So. 2d 910 (Fla.1999); State Department of Public Health v. Wilcox, 458 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). MINER, WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur.…
  • Aurelio PAZ v. A. Duda & Sons, Inc., 45 So. 3d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
    …ative defense that Claimant retained a substantial earning capacity. Although the JCC found Claimant successfully performed post-injury employment, which is sufficient to prove a substantial earning capacity, see Polk County School Board v. Santana, 718 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), the JCC failed to acknowledge Dr. Galang’s testimony that Claimant’s restrictions have since changed. Finally, because the JCC erred in analyzing the claim for PTD benefits, the JCC also erred in denying the claim for penalties…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw