NED GUILFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1998-08-14
No. 98-1912
COBB, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
715 So. 2d 363 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s most recent post-conviction motion. This is the defendant’s fourth post-conviction motion and sixth appeal or petition to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case , No. 91-6837-CFA. Enough is enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. 91-6837-CFA. As this court did in Hendrix v. State, 712 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Davis v. State, 705 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Rooney v. State, 699 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) and O’Brien v. State, 689 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So. 2d 511 (Fla.1997), the defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting.

AFFIRMED. '

COBB, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ned Guilford v. State, 908 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
    …have been raised in a direct appeal or by a motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, and the applicable time limits to raise them have long since passed. The court also dismissed Guilford’s petition because of this court’s opinion in Guilford v. State, 715 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). In that case we documented that Guil-ford had been a frequent visitor to this court, seeking to collaterally challenge his sentences and convictions in Case No. 91-6837-CFA. In Guilford, supra, this court noted that that was Gu…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw