JULIETTE H. J. COLMAN, SUING BY HER HUSBAND AND NEXT FRIEND, F. E. COLMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MARTIN MACHA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Per Curiam.
In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice West are of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Browne and Mr. Justice Terrell are of the opinion that said judgment should be reversed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380; and State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, decided at this term.
An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dale v. Jennings, 90 Fla. 234 (Fla. 1925)…he court, the judgment, decree or order should be affirmed, so that the litigation may not be unduly prolonged. Stubblefield v. Wilson, 88 Fla. 323, 102 South. Rep. 885; State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 South. Rep. 796; Colman v. Macha, 87 Fla. 529, 100 South. Rep. 796. Where the members of the Supreme Court sitting six members in a body after full consultation are equally divided in opinion as to whether or not a judgment should be reversed, and there is.no prospect of an immediate change in…
Authorities Cited
- The State of Fla. ex rel. Hiram J. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224 (Fla. 1904)
- Quigg v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197 (Fla. 1923)
- Pensacola Elec. Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389 (Fla. 1911)