WARREN ROSEMARIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, AND SYNTEX LABORATORIES, INC., APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1998-06-17
Nos. 97-1902, 97-3264
Glickstein, J., Gross, J., Goldenberg, Renee, Associate Judge
712 So. 2d 1188 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The court affirmed that termination payments and pension benefits from a former employer constitute wages under Florida unemployment law, disqualifying the claimant from benefits when the pension exceeded the weekly benefit amount.


Holding

Termination payments and pension benefits from a base period employer constitute wages under Florida Statutes § 443.036(33)(a), disqualifying a claimant from unemployment benefits when the pension exceeds the weekly benefit amount.


Headnotes

[1] Termination payments and pension benefits paid by a base period employer and reported as wages constitute wages within the meaning of Florida Statutes § 443.036(33)(a) fo…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Rosemarin ceased working for Syntex in November 1994 and received biweekly termination payments of approximately $3,022.27 through December 31, 1996, …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the orders of the Unemployment Appeals Commission. Appellant ceased working for Syntex in November, 1994. From late 1994 until December 31, 1996, he received termination payments from Syntex of about $3,022.27 biweekly. From each check, Syntex deducted federal withholding and social security taxes and reported the payments as wages paid to the Division of Unemployment Compensation. In July, 1996, appellant began to receive a retirement pension from Syntex of $1,100.00 per month.

On December 2, 1996, appellant filed a claim for unemployment benefits as a result of his termination from a different employer. The date of the claim created a “base period” of July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996. See § 443.036(5), Fla. Stat. (1997). During the base period, appellant received $72,536.40. from Syntex. These payments constituted “wages” within the meaning of section 443.036(33)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). The pension benefit from Syntex exceeded the weekly benefit amount to which appellant was entitled. He was therefore disqualified from receiving benefits pursuant to section 443.101(8)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). We construe the term “base period employer” in section 443.101(8)(a) to mean an employer that pays section 443.036(33) “wages” to an employee during the base period.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and GROSS, JJ., and GOLDENBERG, RENEE, Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Harmon v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 830 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Rosemarin v. State Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 712 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). PETERSON, PLEUS and PALMER, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw