WILLIE GEORGE ROSS, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI AND GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, APPELLEES
WILLIE GEORGE ROSS, APPELLANT,
CITY OF MIAMI AND GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, APPELLEES
712 So. 2d 438
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order granting the State of Georgia, Department of Human Resources, leave to intervene to assert a lien in this cause after the final judgment in this case had been affirmed on appeal and the mandate had issued.
The rule regarding postjudgment interventions has been well established, absent an exception, not present here, “intervention may not be allowed after final judgment”. Dickinson v. Segal, 219 So. 2d 435, 436 (Fla.1969) (footnote omitted); see also Wags Transp. Sys., Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So. 2d 751, 752 (Fla.1956); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.230.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mehboob Jivanjee v. State, 724 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…n sentencing order later rendered, however provided for a 50-year term of imprisonment, with the 15-year mandatory minimum sentence. A written sentencing order must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. See Tannehill v. State, 712 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Denson v. State, 711 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Murguia v. State, 711 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Alvarez v. State, 698 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Ramos v. State, 682 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Accordingly, def…
-
Brimage v. State, 745 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…day in state prison, not as a habitual offender, but rather concurrently with a habitual offender sentence imposed in another case. A written sentencing order must conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. See Tannehill v. State, 712 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Moreover, a trial court cannot habitualize a defendant on a case if it did not, at the time of the original sentencing, have the option of imposing a habitual offender sentence. See Snead v. State, 616 So. 2d 964 (Fla.1993). Re…
-
Turner v. State, 731 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…PER CURIAM. This cause is remanded to the trial court to conform the written sentencing orders to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See Tannehill v. State, 712 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Specifically, any reference that the sentences are coterminous must be removed from the written sentencing orders. Remanded.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wags Transp. Sys., Inc. v. City OF Miami Beach, 88 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 1956)
- Dickinson v. Segal, 219 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1969)