ALPHONSO BROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE
ALPHONSO BROOKS, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE
710 So. 2d 760
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We treat Brooks’ appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the same. See Gattis v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm’n, 535 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), rev. denied, 542 So. 2d 1333 (Fla.1989).
BARFIELD, C.J., and JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Raulerson v. State, 763 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 2000)…we have for review Murray v. State, 701 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Lucio v. State, 701 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Austin v. State, 709 So. 2d 1389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Castro v. State, 710 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Harvey v. State, 710 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Gaillard v. State, 707 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Beebe v. State, 706 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Hawkins v. State, 748 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); and State v. Santiago, 713 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), which…
Authorities Cited
- Louie Gattis v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 535 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)