BERTHA MAXWELL, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND AND NEXT FRIEND DAVID MAXWELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
BERTHA MAXWELL, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND AND NEXT FRIEND DAVID MAXWELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
87 Fla. 117
Florida Supreme Court (1924)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam
The judgment herein is hereby reversed on the authority of David Maxwell v. City of Miami, this day filed.
Reversed.
All concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shamhart v. Morrison Cafeteria Co., 159 Fla. 629 (Fla. 1947)…business as reflected in this record devolved upon the city. Tallahassee v. Fortune, 3 Fla. 19; Kaufman v. City of Tallahassee; 94 So. 697, 84 Fla. 634; Maxwell v. City of Miami, 100 So. 147, 87 Fla. 107; City of Tallahassee v. Kaufman, 100 So. 150, 87 Fla. 117; Douglass v. Sapotnick, 126 Fla. 756, 171 So. 765; F.S. 1941, Sections 167.01 and 167.05. The decree of the lower Court should be affirrqed. BUFORD, and BARNS, JJ., concur.…