GERALD LEE ALLEN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GERALD LEE ALLEN, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
709 So. 2d 653
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 775.084(4)(e), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1988) (“A sentence imposed under this section [the habitual offender sentence] shall not be subject to the provisions of s. 921.001 [the sentencing guidelines].”); Gipson v. State, 616 So. 2d 992, 993 (Fla.1993).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swift v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)…3 So. 2d 241, 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“We affirm the trial court’s denial of [the] petition for writ of habeas corpus based on the lack of factual assertions regarding the exhaustion of his available administrative remedies.”); Pryor v. Singletary, 709 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to reapply for habeas corpus . . . in the trial court upon a proper showing of legally sufficient grounds and exhaustion of administrative remedies.”); Moore v. Singletary, 624 So…
Authorities Cited
- Gipson v. State, 616 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1993)