T.E., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
T.E., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
709 So. 2d 652
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. A.B.G. v. State, 586 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); C.N.W. v. State, 670 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States Sugar Corp. v. G.J. Henson, 787 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…ven the depositional nature of testimony in workers’ compensation proceedings, this manner of raising a Frye objection did not provide the opportunity for the JCC to conduct a separate evidentiary Frye hearing. See, e.g., Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc., 709 So. 2d 652, 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The Frye Reliability Standard To be admissible in Florida courts, an expert’s opinion relating to matters involving novel scientific evidence10 must be based upon scientific methods and principles that are generally accep…
Authorities Cited
- A.B.G. v. State, 586 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- C.N.W. v. State, 670 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)