THE MILLS CORPORATION, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF FLORIDA, CHARLES A. MILLS, G. A. MILLS AND JAMES IT. GILMAN, APPELLANTS,
v.
P. SEBASTIAN SCHERER, APPELLEE
THE MILLS CORPORATION, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF FLORIDA, CHARLES A. MILLS, G. A. MILLS AND JAMES IT. GILMAN, APPELLANTS,
P. SEBASTIAN SCHERER, APPELLEE
87 Fla. 34
Florida Supreme Court (1921)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
-This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and. the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby, affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Knight v. The Bd. of Pub. Instruction for the Cnty. of Hillsborough, 102 Fla. 922 (Fla. 1931)…531, 91 So. 685; Apgar v. Wilkinson, 95 Fla. 457, 116 So. 78; Jackson Lumber Co. v. Walton Co., 95 Fla. 632, 116 So. 771; State ex rel. v. Tyler, 95 Fla. 811, 116 So. 760; State ex rel. v. Daniel, 87 Fla. 270, 99 So. 804; State ex rel. v. Fearnside, 87 Fla. 34, 100 So. 256. Even though when the bill was introduced into the legislature the provisions of its title and those in the body of the Act were of uniform operation throughout the State, the bill as enacted and authenticated, is by its title and its…