C. CLARK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
C. CLARK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
86 Fla. 478
Florida Supreme Court (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The evidence as to the guilt of the accused is circumstantial, and is of such a nature that a new trial should be granted.
Reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J'. J., concur.-
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Luke, 156 Fla. 638 (Fla. 1945)…la. 499, 12 So. 231. Motion for a new trial and a ruling thereon are necessary to question the sufficiency of all the evidence to sustain the verdict. Florida cities Bus Co. v. Lewis, 107 Fla. 248, 146 So. 96; Osceola Fertilizer Company v. Beville, 86 Fla. 478, 98 So. 354; St. Andrews Bay Lumber Company, v. Bernard, 106 Fla. 232, 143 So. 159; Gilbert v. State, 148 Fla. 293, 4 So. (2nd) 330, and cases cited. Entry of judgment is not equivalent to an order over-ruling motion for new trial for the [*645] pur…