GLENN V. SCOTT, APPELLANT,
v.
CARY A. HARDEE, GOVERNOR; ERNEST AMOS, COMPTROLLER; J. C. LUNING, STATE TREASURER; RIVERS BUFORD, ATTORNEY GENERAL; W. A. MCRAE, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE, OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OF AND COMPOSING THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF EVERGLADES DRAINAGE DISTRICT, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree in a case involving the Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District. The court found no errors in the lower court's decision.
The Florida Supreme Court held that there were no errors in the Circuit Court's decree.
“This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being how advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree”
This quote describes the court's review process and its initial finding regarding the lower court's decree.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case was submitted to the Florida Supreme Court on a transcript of the record, briefs, and arguments. The specific facts leading to the lower cour…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being how advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court bé, and the same is hereby, affirmed, on the authority of Lainhart v. Catts, 73 Fla. 735, 75 South. Rep. 47; Bannerman v. Catts, 80 Fla. 170, 85 South. Rep. 336; Everglades Sugar & Land Co. v. Bryan, 81 Fla. 75, 87 South. Rep. 68; Berry v. Hardee, 83 Fla. 531, 91 South. Rep. 685.
Affirmed.
Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lainhart v. Catts, 73 Fla. 735 (Fla. 1917)
- Bannerman v. Catts, 80 Fla. 170 (Fla. 1920)
- The Everglades Sugar & Land Co. v. Bryan, 81 Fla. 75 (Fla. 1921)
- Berry v. Cary A. Hardee, 83 Fla. 531 (Fla. 1922)