JOANNE L. SAXION, APPELLANT,
v.
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1998-03-18
No. 97-02139
BLUE and FRANK, JJ., concur.
707 So. 2d 410 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the Unemployment Appeals Commission erred in reversing the appeals referee's decision when there was competent, substantial evidence to support the referee's findings.


Facts & Procedural History

A claimant challenged an order reversing an appeals referee's decision that she performed her duties as a nurse competently. Any errors made were not …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

Claimant challenges the Unemployment Appeals Commission (U.A.C.) order reversing the decision of the appeals referee and denying her unemployment compensation benefits. We reverse.

The U.A.C. can reverse a finding by the appeals referee only when the referee’s decision is not based on substantial, competent evidence. See Tedder v. Florida U.A.C., 697 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). The U.A.C. cannot reweigh evidence and substitute its findings of fact for that of the referee. See Georgia v. U.A.C.; 647 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Studor, Inc. v. Duren, 635 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

In the instant case, the record supports the decision of the appeals referee that claimant consistently performed her duties as a nurse to the best of her ability and that any errors made were not intentional and were within the employer’s accepted guidelines. Since there is competent, substantial evidence to support the referee’s findings that claimant was not careless or negligent, the U.A.C. erred in reversing that determination.

Accordingly, we reverse the order of the U.A.C. and remand for reinstatement of the appeals referee’s decision.

BLUE and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw