ANIXIS KAZOURIS, APPELLANT,
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
ANIXIS KAZOURIS, APPELLANT,
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
706 So. 2d 960
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1998)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether the insurer can insist on an independent medical examination when the insured makes a claim under uninsured motorist coverage. We adopt the analysis of De Ferrari v. Government Employees Insurance Company, 613 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 620 So. 2d 760 (Fla.1993), and affirm.
AFFIRMED.
W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Curran, 83 So. 3d 793 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…octors chosen by us, at our expense, as we may reasonably require” and that the insurance company did not have to show that it was prejudiced by the noncompliance), review denied, 620 So. 2d 760 (Fla.1993); see also Kazouris v. Gov’t Emps. Ins. Co., 706 So. 2d 960, 960 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (specifically adopting the analysis in De Ferrari to resolve the issue “whether the insurer can insist on an independent medical examination when the insured makes a claim under uninsured motorist coverage.”); Goldman v. Sta…1 / 3
Authorities Cited
- de Ferrari v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 613 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)