LAW OFFICES OF SHARON P. TALBOT, P.A., APPELLANT,
v.
LESLIE JEANAL SAVOIE, APPELLEE
LAW OFFICES OF SHARON P. TALBOT, P.A., APPELLANT,
LESLIE JEANAL SAVOIE, APPELLEE
705 So. 2d 1072
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s order dissolving charging lien. This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to exercise any other remedy which may be available to her. See Litman v. Fine, Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block & England, P.A., 517 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So. 2d 879 (Fla.1988); see also Glickman v. Scherer, 566 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED.
STONE, C.J., and GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ballesteros v. Ballesteros, 819 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)…onthly income was $1775, former wife’s net monthly income was $1263, and the former husband was left with only $709 per month to support himself after paying alimony. Former wife will have $2,128.85 available for her needs.); Benenfeld v. Benenfeld, 705 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(alimony award was excessive where alimony award and insurance deductible together constituted nearly 80% of the husband’s net income); Decker v. Decker, 660 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)(court abused its discretion in awarding…
-
Carola Yeakle v. Yeakle, 12 So. 3d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…ly income was $1775, former wife’s net monthly income was $1263, and the former husband was left with only $709 per month to support himself after paying alimony. Former wife would have had $2,128.85 available for her needs); Benenfeld v. Benenfeld, 705 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (alimony award was excessive where alimony award and insurance deductible together constituted nearly 80% of the husband’s net income); Decker v. Decker, 660 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (court abused its discretion in awardin…
-
Miller v. Blair A. Miller, 707 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…awards together constitute nearly all of the husband’s net monthly income. As such, we find that the present award places an undue burden on the husband based on the record evidence and findings as to his ability to pay. See Benenfeld v. Benenfeld, 705 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(holding that a husband cannot be required to pay a support award that exceeds his financial ability); Chereskin v. Chereskin, 665 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)(reversing final judgment which required payments by husband for sup…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Elliot v. State, 517 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Litman v. Fine, 517 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Glickman v. Coralie Scherer, 566 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)