J. J. HAYMANS, JR., ALVIN HAYMANS AND GLADYS HAYMANS, MINORS, BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND, T. C. MCEACHIN AND ISABELLE HAYMANS, AND T. C. MCEACHIN, ISABELLE HAYMANS AND LONNIE HAYMANS, AS ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF J. J. HAYMANS, DECEASED, APPELLANTS,
v.
ELONZA HAYMANS (BETTER KNOWN AS LONNIE HAYMANS) AND HOYT HAYMANS, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1923-07-03
Whitfield, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
86 Fla. 110 Florida Supreme Court (1923)

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court.upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Towles vs. Roundtree, 10 Fla. 299, Taylor v. Everett 60 Fla. 362, 52 So. 980.

Whitfield, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw