RANDOLPH WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,
v.
THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted a petition for writ of certiorari, holding that a county court lacked jurisdiction to impose probation for municipal ordinance violations when the ordinances did not authorize probation as a penalty at the time of sentencing.
A county court acts outside its jurisdiction by imposing probation for violations of municipal ordinances that do not authorize probation as an alternate penalty.
[1] A county court exceeds its jurisdiction by imposing probation as a sentence for municipal ordinance violations when the ordinances do not authorize probation as an altern…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the county court acted outside its jurisdiction by sentencing petitioner to terms of probation for violating municipal ordinances that at that time did not provide for probation as an alternate penalty”
Statement of the court's holding regarding the county court's lack of jurisdiction
Petitioner was sentenced to eight terms of probation in 1991 for violations of the South Florida Building Code adopted by Fort Lauderdale; at that tim…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unauthorized Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
PARIENTE, Judge.
This is a petition for writ of certiorari, wherein petitioner challenges the circuit court’s denial of his petition for writ of prohibition. We grant the petition in part, finding that the county court acted outside its jurisdiction by sentencing petitioner to terms of probation for violating municipal ordinances that at that time did not provide for probation as an alternate penalty.
Petitioner was sentenced to eight terms of probation for eight violations of the South Florida Building Code, adopted by the City of Fort Lauderdale in section 9-1 of its code. At the time probation was imposed, in 1991, city ordinance violations were punishable only by a maximum term of incarceration of up to ninety days, or a fine not exceeding $500, or both. Although the City of Fort Lauderdale has since revised its code to include probation as an alternate penalty, neither the city code nor the South Florida Building Code provided for probation at the time petitioner was sentenced. Thus, the imposition of probation upon petitioner was an unauthorized sentence. See Pridgen v. City of Auburndale, 430 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Accordingly, we quash the circuit court’s denial of the writ of prohibition, and remand with directions for the county court to strike the sanctions of probation imposed, as well as the now pending violations of this unauthorized probation. We deny the petition as to all other points raised, finding these points to be without merit.
WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Garland H. Pridgen v. City OF Auburndale, 430 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)