INVERSIONES S.O.S., APPELLANT,
v.
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, PROPERTY U.S.A., INC., AND NICHOLAS R. NOLTER, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of replevin for property located outside the state.
A bank sued for payment on a promissory note and sought a writ of replevin for a yacht. The trial court issued the writ, but the yacht was located in …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdiction Over Property cases and more on FLexlaw
KLEIN, Judge.
A company called Property U.S.A. and its president, Nicholas Nolter, were the payor and guarantor on a promissory note to the appellee bank, secured by a yacht owned by Property U.S.A When the note went into default, the bank filed this action seeking payment of the note and a writ of replevin to recover the yacht, alleging that it was located in Costa Rica. After a show cause hearing at which the defendants failed to appear, the court entered an order on June 28, 1996, directing the clerk to issue a writ of replevin. In February 1997, a Costa Rican court domesticated the order as a Costa Rican order. Appellant, in May 1997, moved to intervene in the trial court action, alleging that the action was still pending, that appellant was the owner of the yacht, and that the replevin order should be set aside on the ground that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to grant replevin because the yacht was in Costa Rica. The trial court granted the motion to intervene, but refused to set aside the order, resulting in this appeal.
Although the trial court had jurisdiction over the claim on the promissory note, it did not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of replev-in, because the property is not within the state. Prestige Rentr-A-Car, Inc. v. Advantage Car Rental & Sales, Inc., 656 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) and cases cited therein. We therefore reverse and remand for the order directing the issuance of a writ of replevin to be vacated.
GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Prestige Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Advantage CAR Rental & Sales, 656 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)