IN RE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, RULE 2.050(B)(10)
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court amended Rule of Judicial Administration 2.050(b)(10) to establish mandatory training and experience requirements for judges presiding over capital cases. The amendment modifies requirements for judges hearing capital cases where the state seeks the death penalty or collateral proceedings brought by death row inmates.
The Court amended Rule 2.050(b)(10) to require that judges presiding over capital cases have: (1) a minimum of six months service in a felony criminal division; (2) successful completion of the "Handling Capital Cases" course within the last 5 years; (3) attendance at refresher courses during subsequent continuing judicial education reporting periods; and (4) allows the Chief Justice to waive requirements in exceptional circumstances at the chief judge's request.
[1] Judges presiding over capital cases must have served a minimum of six months in a felony criminal division and completed a "Handling Capital Cases" course within the last…
[2] Judges must complete the "Handling Capital Cases" course as soon as practicable upon entering the criminal division.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The chief judge shall ensure that no judge presides over a capital case in which the state is seeking the death penalty or collateral proceedings brought by a death row inmate until that judge has served a minimum of six 6 months in a felony criminal division and has successfully completed the "Handling Capital Cases" course offered through the Florida College of Advanced Judicial Studies within the-last 5 years.”
Establishes the core requirements for judicial qualification in capital cases
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn February 7, 1997, the Court enacted Rule 2.050(b)(10) requiring judges in capital cases to have minimum experience and training. The rule became ef…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judicial Administration Rules cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On February 7, 1997, this Court enacted Rule of Judicial Administration 2.050(b)(10) to ensure that all judges hearing capital cases have the experience and training necessary to handle the unique demands of such proceedings. In re Amendment to the Flori da Rules of Judicial Administration, Rule 2.050(b)(10), 688 So. 2d 320 (Fla.1997). Although the rule became effective immediately, we gave interested parties until March 31, 1997, to file comments. Thereafter, the Court requested input fi"om the Florida Court Education Council on how to resolve the practical problems encountered in implementing the new rule.
Having duly considered the comments filed by interested parties and the recommendations of the Florida Court Education Council, the Court hereby amends rule 2.050(b)(10) as follows. The new language is indicated by underscoring and strike-through type indicates deletions. The amendments shall become effective immediately.
(10) The chief judge shall ensure that no judge presides over a capital case in which the state is seeking the death penalty or collateral proceedings brought by a death row inmate until that judge has served a minimum of six 6 months in a felony criminal division and has successfully completed the “Handling Capital Cases” course offered through the Florida College of Advanced Judicial Studies within the-last 5 years. Each judge must complete the “Handling Capital Cases” course as soon as practicable upon entering the criminal division. Once a judge success fully completes the “Handling Capital Cases” course, the judge must thereafter attend a “refresher” course during each of the subsequent continuing judicial education reporting periods. The Gchief ¿justice may waive this the course requirement in exceptional circumstances at the request of the chief judge. This requirement shall not preclude a judge from presiding in collateral proceedings in a case in which the judge presided over the trial or an earlier collateral proceeding. Court Comments
The refresher course may be a six-hour block during any Florida Court Education Council approved course offering sponsored by any approved Florida judicial education provider, including the Florida College of Advanced Judicial Studies or the Florida Conference of Circuit Judges. The block must contain instruction on the following topics: penalty phase, jury selection, and rule 3,850 proceedings.
Failure to complete the refresher course during the three-year judicial education reporting period will necessitate completion of the original “Handling Capital Cases” course.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and GRIMES, Senior Justice, concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Amendments TO Fla. Rule OF Jud. Admin. 2.215, 992 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 2008)…requirement allowing a judge to preside over the collateral proceeding of a capital defendant at whose trial or earlier collateral proceeding the judge had presided. In re Amendment to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, Rule 2.050(b)(10), 701 So. 2d 864, 865 (Fla.1997). Subsequently, in amending rule 2.050(b)(4), the Court removed the requirement that a judge who presided over a capital trial resulting in a death sentence was to preside over any collateral proceeding brought by the same defendant.…
-
In re Amendments TO Fla. Rule OF Jud. Admin. 2.215(b)(10), 75 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 2011)…o this opinion returns subdivision (b)(10)(C) to the original period contemplated when the Court first amended the rule to include the refresher course requirement. See In re Amendment to the Fla. Rules of Judicial Administration, Rule 2.050(b)(10), 701 So. 2d 864, 865 (Fla.1997). Accordingly, we amend Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.215 as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring and deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendment shall bec…
Authorities Cited
- In re Amendment TO THE Florida Rules OF Judicial Administration, 688 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 1997)