MARK BOUGHMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1997-11-12
No. 96-00977
DANAHY, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.
701 So. 2d 639 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.

FRANK, Judge.

We affirm the sentences imposed upon Mark Boughman after he pleaded guilty to violating his probation. We note, however, that the trial court imposed a $500 public defender’s hen after informing Boughman of the amount of the lien and his right to challenge it. The written judgment, however, does not reflect the statutory authority upon which the lien was imposed. See Williams v. State, 661 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The judgment must be corrected to recite the appropriate statute. Furthermore, a $100 “attorney cost” was announced at the sentencing but without reference to statutory authority either orally or in writing on the judgment. Because that cost does not appear to be authorized, it must be stricken. See Reyes.

Remanded for correction of the judgment.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Phelps v. State, 712 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
    …61 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). The judgment must be corrected to recite the appropriate statute. In addition, an unauthorized “$100 attorney cost” must be stricken. See Reyes; Boughman v. State, 701 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Remanded for correction of the judgment. FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw