ROMAN BROCHE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROMAN BROCHE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
701 So. 2d 446
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences for first degree murder, armed burglary, and armed robbery without prejudice for him to raise his challenge to his trial counsel’s closing argument before the jury on a 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P., postconviction motion in the lower court. See Nixon v. State, 572 So. 2d 1336, 1340 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854, 112 S.Ct. 164, 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Perez v. State, 711 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…3d DCA 1997); Gill v. State, 683 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Because Perez has failed to present reversible error, we affirm the convictions. Affirmed. . Plaza was tried separately. . This court affirmed Broche's convictions. Broche v. State, 701 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). .The court did not err in admitting Broche’s "individually self-incriminating” statements. Franqui v. State, 699 So. 2d 1312, 1320 (Fla.1997), cert denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1337, 140 L.Ed.2d 499 (1998).…
-
Laurinston Bailey v. State, 145 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…cate the revocation of probation on those counts. Otherwise, the trial court’s order is affirmed without pi’ejudice to Bailey to raise any claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in an appropriate post-conviction proceeding. See Broche v. State, 701 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.…
Authorities Cited
- Nixon v. State, 572 So. 2d 1336 (Fla. 1990)
- Newman v. United States, 502 U.S. 854 (U.S. 1991)
- Dugan v. Ohio, 502 U.S. 854 (U.S. 1991)