HANSON-MURPHY, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1997-09-17
No. 97-1508
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SORONDO, JJ.
698 So. 2d 1378 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a claim for malicious prosecution of a civil action accrues for venue purposes in the county where that action was filed.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiffs sued for malicious prosecution of a civil action. The original civil action was filed in Orange County, and the present plaintiffs (defenda…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Because it is obvious that at least some damages were sustained in that county, we agree with the trial court that this claim for malicious prosecution of a civil action accrued for venue purposes in Orange County where that action was filed, see §§ 47.011, 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1995)1; 92 C.J.S. Venue § 19 n. 35 (1955); 77 Am.Jur.2d Venue § 39 (1997); see Soowal v. Marden, 452 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); E.J. Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Southeast First Nat’l Bank, 415 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see generally Kumar v. Embassy Kosher Tours, Inc., 696 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So. 2d 1153 (Fla.1986), even though other injuries may have been subsequently incurred in Dade County where the present plaintiffs, then-defendants, reside. See Gaboury v. Flagler Hosp., Inc., 316 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Since none of the present defendants, then-plaintiffs, reside in Dade County, there is no basis for fixing venue here. The order under review transferring the instant case to Orange County is therefore

Affirmed.

. 47.011 Where actions may be begun. — Actions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant resides, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located. This section shall not apply to actions against nonresidents, [emphasis supplied].

47.051 Actions against corporations. — Actions against domestic coiporations shall be brought only in the counly where such corporation has, or usually keeps, an office for transaction of its customary business, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located .... [emphasis supplied].


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw