DAVID LEE TRAMMELL, APPELLANT,
v.
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, APPELLEE
DAVID LEE TRAMMELL, APPELLANT,
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, APPELLEE
696 So. 2d 822
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant filed an amended petition to change his name. The trial court dismissed the petition with prejudice, finding it to be legally insufficient. We reverse and hold that the amended petition sufficiently, though minimally, contains the allegations required by section 68.07, Florida Statutes (1993).
Reversed. Amended petition reinstated.1
DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur. . Section 68.07, Florida Statutes (1994), is not applicable to this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
K.M.T. v. State, 695 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…indings to support its dispositions. Under section 39.052(4)(e)l., Florida Statutes (1995), if the court finds that adjudication and commitment are appropriate, it must specify its reasons in writing or on the record of the hearing. J.R.C. v. State, 696 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); M.S.M. v. State, 639 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Further, section 39.052(4)(e)3. permits the court to commit the child at a restrietiveness level different than that recommended by the department only if the court states “the…
-
J.C. v. State, 707 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…)(e)(l), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996). When a trial court finds that adjudication and commitment are appropriate, it must specify its reasons for that conclusion, either on the record or in writing. § 39.052(4)(e)(l), Fla. Stat. See J.R.C. v. State, 696 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); J.M. v. State, 692 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); M.C. v. State, 687 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The trial court did not specifically state the basis for its decision to adjudicate and commit the appellant. Accordingly, we r…
-
J.B., Jr. v. State, 718 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…e disposition hearing the court shall consider a predisposition report regarding the suitability of the child for disposition ...” (emphasis added). The requirement that the court first consider a predisposition report is mandatory. J.R.C. v. State, 696 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); B.B. v. State, 647 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); M.H. v. State, 621 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). There is nothing in the record to indicate a knowing and intelligent waiver of this requirement. The predispositional recommenda…