BRASSIE GOLF CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
BRYAN STRONG, TRUSTEE FOR THE UA CANADIAN PIPELINE INDUSTRY NATIONAL PENSION FUND AND THE EDMONTON PIPE INDUSTRY PENSION TRUST FUND, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Temporary Injunctive Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Brassie Golf Corporation, challenges a nonfinal order granting temporary injunctive relief to the appellee, the Edmonton Pipe Industry Pension Trust Fund, relative to a contract dispute between the parties. We find merit only in Brassie’s contention that the injunction order improperly fails to recite sufficient factual findings to support the four conclusions necessary for an injunction. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610(c). See also Platinum Coast Financial Corp. v. Farino’s, Inc., 662 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Thus, while the record supports the issuance of a temporary injunction in this instance, we remand this cause to the trial court for entry of an order which sets forth the necessary factual findings. See Richard v. Behavioral Healthcare Options, Inc., 647 So. 2d 976, 978 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). The case is affirmed in all other respects.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
THREADGILL, C.J., and PARKER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodriquez v. State, 700 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…sment of the Public Defender’s practices in processing appeals in order to confirm that a factual basis existed for the Public Defender’s motions. In re Certification, 636 So. 2d at 22. This court again addressed this problem in Fletcher v. State, 696 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (en banc), when an assistant public defender filed a motion to reinstate an appeal in which he made the assertion that a defendant who escaped had not “thwarted the orderly effective administration of justice” where “that system i…
Authorities Cited
- State v. King, 647 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
- Platinum Coast Fin. Corp. & Michael J. Miceli v. Farino's, Inc., 662 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)