ASTLEY GREENFIELD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ASTLEY GREENFIELD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
695 So. 2d 919
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This case is affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a properly sworn motion under the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure within 30 days. See Adams v. State, 519 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Scott v. State, 464 So. 2d 1171 (Fla.1985).
STONE, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Belz Investco Ltd. P'ship v. Groupo Immobiliano Cababie, S.A., 721 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…e, expending money, time, and effort. Plainly these activities qualify as a “business venture” for purposes of the long-arm statute. See Atwood v. Calumet Indus., Inc., 308 So. 2d 555, 556 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); see also Empire Indus., Inc. v. Kaplan, 695 So. 2d 919, 920-21 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Sutton v. Smith, 603 So. 2d 693, 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). That the City ultimately selected another bidder does not undo the fact that a venture was formed with the goal of winning the bidding competition. The Florida l…
Authorities Cited
- Scott v. State, 464 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 1985)
- Normand R. Adams v. State, 519 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
- Ziemba v. Ziemba, 519 So. 2d 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)