FERRARI KOONCE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FERRARI KOONCE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
695 So. 2d 906
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment and sentence are affirmed, however, the cause is remanded for entry of a written order of revocation of probation.
MINER, ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vasta v. Universal Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 407 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025)
-
Lexington Ins. Co. v. CSX Transp., Inc., 828 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Worth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 695 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). ERVIN, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.…
-
Guess v. City OF Miramar, 889 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…, 409 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Here, there is no abuse of discretion where the verdict form paralleled the court’s instruction on the law- — an instruction the trial court gave at Guess’s request. See Worth v. State Farm, Fire and Cas. Co., 695 So. 2d 906, 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (while the content of a verdict form is within the trial court’s discretion, the verdict form should parallel the court’s instruction on the law); Bohannon v. Thomas, 592 So. 2d 1246, 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (jury instructio…