ARIC ANTWAN GAINER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ARIC ANTWAN GAINER, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
693 So. 2d 719
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Aric Antwan Gainer, claims that he should be awarded an extra 23 days as credit for time served before the imposition of his sentence. We agree and reverse.
The defendant was arrested on July 27, 1995, for various crimes. Prior to the defendant’s incarceration on August 21, 1995, he was in the custody of the Juvenile Justice Detention Center. The State properly concedes that the defendant’s award of 304 days as credit for time served did not include the days he was in the custody of the juvenile detention center. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a determination of the defendant’s pre-sentence credit for time served. See Knox v. State, 692 So. 2d 296, 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
L.K. v. State, 729 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…eflect that the statutory maximum term for simple battery is one year and to allow appellant credit for time served in secure detention prior to her adjudication on this offense. See E.R. v. State, 584 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Gainer v. State, 693 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); In Interest of B.A., 546 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). [*1012] Accordingly, we reverse and remand for correction of the disposition order to limit the commitment term to one year with credit for time served in secure detention…
-
Thompson v. State, 744 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…spent in the juvenile detention center. Accordingly, the order denying Thompson’s motion seeking credit for time served is reversed with directions to the trial court to credit the 21 days spent in the juvenile detention center. See Gainer v. State, 693 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1997). Reversed and remanded with directions.…
-
State v. D.S., 760 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…in jail,” a fíne, or both.1 We find, however, that by, in effect, crediting the juvenile for “time served” in detention,2 the court satisfied the alleged jail time requirement. See L.K v. State, 729 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Gainer v. State, 693 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); E.R. v. State, 584 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). This holding makes it unnecessary3 for us to reach the varied and difficult issues surrounding the effect of the sentencing aspect of the ordinance provision on juvenile case…
Authorities Cited
- Knox v. State, 692 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)