NORMAJEAN SCHEIDELL, APPELLANT,
v.
BRYANT BEEBE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the former wife was entitled to cross-examine the guardian ad litem and expert witness before a custody change order could be granted, but affirmed the attorney's fees award.
The former wife appealed a trial court order changing custody and an order awarding attorney's fees. The former wife argued she was denied the opportu…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Modification Of Custody cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The former wife appeals the trial court’s order granting the former husband’s motion to change custody. Because the trial court granted the former husband’s motion without providing the former wife with an opportunity to cross-examine the guardian ad litem and the expert witness, we reverse and remand for a full evidentiary hearing on the merits. Kern v. Kern, 333 So. 2d 17 (Fla.1976); Miller v. Miller, 671 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Leinenbach v. Leinenbach, 634 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Landers v. Landers, 429 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).
Further, the former wife appeals the order granting her an award of attorney’s fees arguing that the trial court erred by awarding fees which were far less than she requested. In the instant case, although the expert testimony as to a reasonable award of attorney’s fees was conflicting, the trial court’s order is supported by competent, substantial evidence. As such, the order is hereby affirmed. § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (1995); Sierra v. Sierra, 505 So. 2d 432 (Fla.1987); Benitez v. Benitez, 337 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
As a result of our disposition of the above issue, we find that the point raised by the former wife regarding the modification of child support is moot. Finally, the remaining issue raised by the former wife lacks merit.
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Kern v. Kern, 333 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1976)
- Sierra v. Sierra, 505 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 1987)
- Miller v. Miller, 671 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- Leinenbach v. Karyn Ruth Leinenbach, 634 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
- Benitez v. Rafaela Benitez, 337 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
- Coons v. Wilmer P. Shriver and Katherine W. Shriver, 429 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
- Stoner v. Dep't of Prof'l Regulation/Construction Indus. Licensing Bd., 429 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)