SAMUEL H. WIGFALS, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1997-04-18
No. 96-842
PETERSON, C.J., and W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
691 So. 2d 644 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court held that a prisoner's transfer to a different county necessitates a venue transfer, not dismissal of the petition.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition in Orange County where he was incarcerated. He was later transferred to Baker County. The trial court dismis…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Samuel H. Wigfals appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his petition for habeas corpus while he was incarcerated in the Orange County Central Florida Reception Center. After the trial court ordered the Florida Probation and Parole Commission to respond to the petition, Wigfals was transferred to and incarcerated in the Baker Correctional Institution.

When the Florida Probation and Parole Commission (FPPC) responded to the trial court’s order to show cause why Wigfals’ petition should not be granted, FPPC filed its motion to transfer venue to Baker County. The motion to transfer venue followed Wigfals’ notice of voluntary dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus, his notice of address change to Baker County and finally his request for reinstatement of his initial petition. Instead of transferring venue, the trial court in Orange County reasoned that it no longer had jurisdiction because section 79.09, Florida Statutes (1995) requires writs to be filed in the county where a prisoner is detained.

Wigfals’ initial selection of venue in Orange County was appropriate since he was incarcerated there. His later transfer to Baker County provided grounds for the transfer of venue to Baker County as requested by FPPC rather than dismissal of the petition.

We therefore vacate the order of dismissal and remand for an order transferring the matter to the circuit court for Baker County.

ORDER VACATED; REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and W. SHARP and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mims v. State, 756 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla.1974); Cavalcante v. Florida Parole Commission, 414 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also, Wigfals v. Florida Parole Commission, 691 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.…
  • Woody v. Fla. Parole Comm'n & Fla. Dep't of Corr., 752 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
    …ion, we do not reach the merits of the habeas claim. On the jurisdiction point, we find that the trial court erred in dismissing the habeas petition. It should have transferred the case to the appropriate court. See Wigfals v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 691 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We, thus, quash the order of dismissal and remand for transfer of the petition to the Dade Circuit Court, where parties can raise all appropriate claims of mootness and arguments on the merits. CERTIORARI GRANTED. DELL, KLEIN…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw